I tried writing a piece about my trip to traffic court. I couldn't get it to work. It was about how some white people there, myself excluded, were being really stupid. They were basically shooting themselves in the foot in front of the judge and slowing things down for everybody else. I tried to just tell the story objective-like, but I couldn't finish it. It demanded some kind of conclusion, "and this is why white people are stupid." Unfortunately, I didn't believe my own bullshit. I couldn't follow the angle. The piece was called "white people are stupid" because I thought it sounded kind of funny, but then I went on to give a more or less serious account of some white people being stupid. The specific account, however, just wasn't sufficient to support the generality, and in order for the piece to be successful that support needed to be there. I removed that piece and wrote this instead.
2 Comments:
Interesting. I thought the traffic piece was dull, so, on those grounds, I don't think it was a bad idea to take it down. At the same time, I find that I have some internal resistance to getting rid of old blog posts, even when I think they suck.
Do you feel any "in the interests of keeping the archival record complete" impulse regarding your blog?
I've been thinking a lot about how much failed media I have up on the net. Perhaps my "archival record" thing is just a way to avoid pruning all the crap...
Typically, I like the idea of leaving everything up. However, I also tend to edit things when they are still fresh. That one was still fresh, and so I had no problem with the ultimate editing decision, complete removal.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home